DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION!

Non-consensual Research (Letter)

 This issue is of public interest and affects everyone.

The Common Rule is a short name for “The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects” and was adopted by a number of federal agencies in 1991.  The Common Rule applies to human subjects’ research conducted, supported, or otherwise subject to regulation.

The Revised Common Rule was the first major revision of the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Research Subjects in over 25 years.  The revised Common Rule (Final Rule subpart) went into effect on January 19, 2019, for all ongoing Human Research which is conducted under a federal Agency or Department Head with the waiver of Informed Consent. 

I am a victim of Non-Consensual Human Research. I have never knowingly or willfully given authorization or consent for implantation of any substance, material, radiofrequency microstimulators (RFM), bio-medical devices, microelectromechanical systems, or other intrusions of body integrity. 

No matter where I interact on this earth; I am black-listed Watch-Listed.  I inadvertently exposed misconduct.  I have been placed in some type of retaliatory government-sponsored take-down program. I am subjected to continuing and ongoing dehumanizing treatment (harassment retaliation and surveillance); as a distraction to what has and is being done to me.  I am being deprived of my right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Citizens throughout the United States are making similar allegations and complaints.  Possibly you might go for a doctor visit, emergency room, a medical or dental procedure. Are you sure that this has not happened or will not happen to you or someone you know?

I am seeking legal help: financial help to pay for the legal help, cost & fees; to ask for judicial remedy; Injunctive Relief as noted in the Clandestine Operations Petition.

Pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act; I am also seeking legal help: financial help to pay for the legal help, cost & fees to challenge parts of the Revised Common Rule: The Revised Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects.

I am asking for my freedom! Will you please help?

 At Issue on the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects:

  1.  The Grandfather Clause.  Where Agency or Department Head use waivers of part or all of the Common Rule {including Informed Consent} and loopholes which would seem to permit Human Experimentation without Informed Consent. 
  2. Human Research involving physical interventions on the physical human body; including electromagnetic signals or electronic devices, physical means, or any other weapon or technology.
  3. Change of the definition of research and enacting the “Intelligence Surveillance Activities” exclusion.
  4. Require subparts shall not violate the 4th and 5th Amendments of the United States Constitution and require meaningful fair and convenient forum and/or procedure to challenge such governmental action. {notice: dates, location, types of technology, types of intervention(s) performed on the human subject.} 

We agree that research is needed; however, our United States government has a horrid history of Human Rights abuses in human experimentation. {see President Clinton’s apology on Human Experimentation.} or visit www.onecommonrule.com (under construction).

The human rights violations and resulting injuries intentionally and in most instances surreptitiously forced against me and others prove; that the public deserves a more protective Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Research Subjects.

The actions directed against me and others are crimes against humanity!  If you or someone you know can assist on this issue; please help save my life and the lives of others. 

Please submit your information via email.   

The years of experimentation and retaliation directed against me and others have caused untold suffering.  (Testimonies available.)

Please make a donation of any amount.

DONATE

The Nuremberg Code: Ten standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects.

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
  2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
  3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
  4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
  5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
  6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
  7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
  8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
  9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
  10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

The Belmont Report gives the following ethical framework to guide human research:

Respect for persons: All individuals should be treated as autonomous agents, and persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection.

Beneficence: Researchers should maximize possible benefits and minimize possible harm.

Justice: All persons should be treated equally, and the selection of research subjects should be scrutinized so that no one is systematically selected on the basis of race, ethnicity, class, or other factors.